Palpable breast lumps has a high yield of breast cancer with PPV up to 80% [1], yet it is not usually felt when it is less than 1 cm unless it is superficial in location which is unusual for breast cancer. Unless suspicious imaging features is seen, it could be mistaken for other breast lesions like dermal and subcutaneous fat lesions [2].
Mammography can be misleading in some cases, due to overlapping of glandular densities or technical insufficiency of the standard views for certain anatomic location of some lesions. Yet, additional views like spot compression, magnification and tangential views can allow correct prediction of benign and malignant breast lesions by improving the visualization and characterization of lesions at the examined region of interest [2] [3].
In this Case, assessment by mammography was the initial modality of choice as the patient is above the age of 40 and she is presenting with a palpable lump, yet mammography only showed a focal asymmetry that was also not calcified and no associated architectural distortion which lowered the prediction of malignancy. But the ultrasound findings were more suspicious, despite the superficial location of the lesion which could be mistaken for an IMLN considering the initial mammographic findings. So, an additional mammographic view was needed to confirm help the radiologist in reaching an appropriate BI-RADS category.
When the additional tangential spot-compression view was performed, It was very clear the similarity between the visualized mass and the ultrasound findings as bi-lobed irregular mass. No lucent halo or fat density was identified within the mass; rising the suspicion of the lesion.
A final assessment of BI-RADS category 4c was given and biopsy was recommended.
Comments